ARH 410 Studio 7 Tectonics and Structure
This course posits new ways to inhabit large urban structures through a process-driven methodology. By challenging type-driven formulaic structural responses, conflicts between architectural priorities and structural efficiencies are celebrated as the starting point of a dialogue that instigates structural adaptations creating rich tectonic expressions, complex spatial configurations, new program relationships.
When structural design lacks integration with architecture, the structural design criteria become largely dependent on efficiencies in cost and construction. The studio projects reinforce the concept of an efficiency that encourages resiliency through tectonic adaptation. This efficiency is understood to exist within a much longer time frame where the expression of the building is both integrative and timeless.
If we posit that architecture is to fulfill a need beyond structural stability and cost-effectiveness in construction, then the integration between architecture and structure points towards a different relationship in which the two disciplines engage in a dialogue. Founded on critical analyses of prevalent formulaic structural solutions, a productive dialogue is one in which there are meaningful conflicts that must be resolved. The students identify sources of conflict in order to develop an adaptable structural system. The metric by which resilience is measured is informed by the degree to which the integration between architecture and structure is successful in creating a trigger for a rich tectonic expression that adapts to conditions and needs while at the same time fulfilling the responsibilities of structural stability and efficiency.
Student Project by Kathleen Agonoy
Student Project by Zoe Zheng
Course Learning Outcomes
- Develop criteria for making design decisions through critique of own work and synthesis of observations
- Visualize and interpret relationships observed in the site context through generative and iterative mapping
- Propose program appropriate for the building type based on a critical and ethical evaluation of contemporary conditions
- Translate architectural intent into a building organization incorporating site, program, circulation, materiality considerations into a formal language
- Critique the building typology for its limitations through critical analyses of precedents with relevant architectural, structural, urban conditions suggestive of new interpretations
- Develop a structural system integrated with architecture that considers the spatial qualities by using load path diagrams as a tool and thickness, density, materiality as variables
- Develop a building envelope system with a tectonic response appropriate for the site and program through the use of spatial skin
- Draft architectural drawings using correct drawing conventions to communicate design intent and the integration of architectural formal logic with structural design
- Incorporate egress and accessibility accommodations by cultivating a sensitivity for equity of access, experiences, and safety
- Student work from this course will meet all or part of NAAB SPC A.6 Use of Precedents: Ability to examine and comprehend the fundamental principles present in relevant precedents and to make informed choices about the incorporation of such principles into architecture and urban design projects
- Student work from this course will meet all or part of NAAB SPC B.3 Codes and Regulations: Ability to design sites, facilities, and systems that are responsive to relevant codes and regulations, and include the principles of life-safety and accessibility standards
- Student work from this course will meet all or part of NAAB SPC B.5 Structural Systems: Ability to demonstrate the basic principles of structural systems and their ability to withstand gravitational, seismic, and lateral forces, as well as the selection and application of the appropriate structural system
- Student work from this course will meet all or part of NAAB SPC C.1 Research: Understanding of the theoretical and applied research methodologies and practices used during the design process
- Student work from this course will meet all or part of NAAB SPC C.2 Integrated Evaluations and Decision-Making Design Process: Ability to demonstrate the skills associated with making integrated decisions across multiple systems and variables in the completion of a design project. This demonstration includes problem identification, setting evaluative criteria, analyzing solutions, and predicting the effectiveness of implementation